Books to read and stuff.
In the spirit of pointless, self-promoting “Best of 2006” lists, here are the books I enjoyed reading this year.
Cat’s Cradle and Slaughterhouse-Five by Kurt Vonnegut
You should read these. They’re both terrific satires—wickedly funny, yet tragically true.
Moneyball by Michael Lewis
If you like baseball stats, read this book. It’s a decent introduction into the realm of sabermetrics. Plus, Joe Morgan hates it.
The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald
I think this book was even better the second time around. It’s still my favorite novel.
The Fountainhead by Ayn Rand
Though it was heavy-handed and propagandistic at times, I still loved Rand’s sense of language. There’s a good chance this book will piss you off.
A Heartbreaking Work of Staggering Genius by Dave Eggers
Uneven, but still a solid effort. I’d say it’s worth reading.
Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy by Douglas Adams
This was most likely the funniest book I read this year.
King Dork by Frank Portman
There’s also a chance that this was the funniest book I read this year. If you hated Catcher in the Rye, which is perhaps impossible, and/or love music, and/or ever wished your prom could end like a certain Stephen King novel, this is the book for you.
Mrs. Dalloway and To the Lighthouse by Virginia Woolf
One of my new favorite authors. If you read “Modern Fiction,” my criticism of plot-driven narrative is summed up perfectly.
Howards End by E.M. Forster
Despite its reliance on coincidence, it offered a nice glimpse into several aspects of English life, especially in its exploration of class and gender distinctions.
Lolita by Vladimir Nabokov
A fun read, despite the somewhat disturbing subject matter.
Special Topics in Calamity Physics by Marisha Pessl
Flawed and pretentious, though I still enjoyed it.
Blue Angel by Francine Prose
If you’ve taken a creative writing workshop or have done some literary theory, you’ll get the jokes in this novel.
Fight Club by Chuck Palahniuk
This wasn’t bad. I thought the ending was kind of silly, but Palahniuk had the right idea, instead of the cheesy way the film closes.
The Buddha of Suburbia by Hanif Kureishi
I wish I grew up in the 70s.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
January 3rd, 2007 at 1:11 pm
okay we get it. you read a lot of books.
January 3rd, 2007 at 1:23 pm
ah, it’s good you saw the point of all that.
January 3rd, 2007 at 2:02 pm
I’ve heard that Palahniuk actually liked the film’s ending better
January 3rd, 2007 at 8:44 pm
Ayn Rand are you serious? I hate her so much it hurts. Her writing style is terrible and her characters are flat and unrealistic and straight out of daytime soaps. UUUHHHH I can’t believe you like her. She really should’ve stuck with philosophy, though even there she’s still evil. I will argue this one to the death with you. She makes me very, very angry.
In other news we are so going to beat you in the bowl. And also all the Notre Dame fans I ran into in New Orleans on new years were really mean and grumpy. Uptight yankees, I swear.
January 4th, 2007 at 1:58 am
I actually loved her writing style. But yeah, her characters were hella lame. We’ll just agree to disagree.
I knew ND would lose big. I think I should just swear off sports, since they’ve never done me any good, except cause me unneeded emotional trauma when I was regularly picked last in gym class.
Notre Dame people mean? No way.
January 7th, 2007 at 3:28 pm
Anne, you are a true fan. Geaux Tigers!
January 7th, 2007 at 4:01 pm
did you read all of Buddha?
January 8th, 2007 at 2:00 am
Yes, I did.